What once was "All Smoke And Mirrors" is now...

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

why i’m STILL voting “yes” on lisbon



Just over one week ago, I published a post here on my blog entitled “Why I’m voting ‘Yes’ On Lisbon”.

My intention was to set out 6 reasons which, when taken together, persuaded me to vote yes in the upcoming referendum.

Apparently, I made a balls of it, and instead, I gave the impression that each individual point on its own was enough to convince me, and what’s more, I suggested that if you didn’t feel the same, you were some kind of moron.

I wholeheartedly apologise for this, and I’d like to give it one more shot, but please, remember that this is how I see it. Just me.

This time, I’m going for the analogy.

For me, the EU is like a bus service.

Generally, I like to go places under my own steam, but once in a while, I need to take the bus, and invariably I use the same route.

Now I know there are many drawbacks to the bus service, and we all talk about them every day…

• You have to associate with people you would normally run away from
• They are rarely on time
• They seem to take ages, mostly because they have to keep stopping to let other people on and off
• The people who work for the service don’t seem to really care about you and your journey
• They’re inconvenient in that they rarely bring you all the way to where you want to go

Despite all of those flaws, I’m glad there’s a bus service, and while I would prefer if the people involved in running things did more to correct those flaws, when a push comes to a shove, I’d rather have one organisation overseeing the whole operation rather than separate ones for every route.

Now, it seems, the people that run the service are trying to introduce a new fleet of buses throughout the system, yet as things transpire, only the people who are on my particular route are being given a direct say in whether or not the new models are turned out.

I have three choices. I can vote “yes”, I can vote “no” or I can not vote at all.

First, I have to ask myself what is meant by my voting “yes”.

Will I have to see the new bus model for myself? Will I have to actually travel in it? If I do, will I be confident that I have tested it in every conceivable condition? What about when it rains? What about days that are busier than others? These buses may work fine now but how will I know that they will stand the test of time?

I couldn’t possibly perform all those tests myself even if I didn’t work full time. So I can’t REALLY give a perfectly-informed “Yes”, can I?

But wait a minute – I see a lot of people are trying to persuade me to Vote “No”. [Just so we’re clear I am NOT referring to 73man here – remember, I’m trying to re-word what I was saying BEFORE his retort]. Who are they?

I check their websites. One thing I notice above all else is that despite the fact that I am being asked not to trust the new service, not once on all the major “no” campaign sites do I see someone willing to link their own name with their reasons for me to vote no.

It seems very simple to me. “My name is (INSERT NAME HERE) and I am voting “No” on the Bus Service, for these reasons…” I could at least respect that even if I didn't actually agree with said reasons.

Even the one major political party which is against it won’t put a name on their main page. A picture, yes, but not a definitive name. So why, therefore, should I trust them?

As well as the lack of accountability, the political party in question is one I would personally never vote for anyway, the reasons for which I’m sure I could find another analogy to annoy my readers on another day, just not this one.

Then I notice that there’s a lot more “no” hype around than “yes”. Does this necessarily mean that more people are against it? Or perhaps there are a lot of people who, like me, would rather say “yes” but are afraid to because they don’t have the time to scrutinize the new buses as I outlined above?

This leads me to believe that if I decide not to vote at all, then these nameless nay-sayers, who at best I disagree with on most matters and at worst I don't trust at all, will get their way.

So when all is said and done, and having taken everything I could conceivably think of into account, I come to the conclusion that just because I can’t inspect the new buses myself, I prefer there to be a service than none at all, and I decide to put MY faith in the people who have run it up to now.

Sure, down the line I will probably still be complaining about it, but something tells me I would have been doing that anyway, and I believe that just because I vote "yes", I haven't thrown away my democratic right to challenge the way the buses run in the future.

THAT is why I am STILL voting “yes” on the Lisbon Treaty.

I’m sorry if you don’t agree, but I don’t expect you to, and feel free to comment either way.

But I will say this – if the Irish vote DOES turn out to be “No” after all, nobody will EVER have the opportunity to say they told me so.

How’s THAT for frightening? ;-)

1 comment/s so far:

BLOG BOYLE said...

I hope this a joke Mr P. On the Lisbon Treaty you just have to ask yourself Why have no other European country being given the right to vote for their futures? Maybe because some of them rejected it in its previous form, and for good reason. We had our oppertunity on the Nice treaty and rejected it, but Backhand Bertie decided we were wrong so he gave us another chance to get the result he wanted, Rejecting this treaty is not rejecting Europe, it's just giving them,eurocrats, a second chance to get it right next time. I would like to see a Fair Trade Europe not a Free Trade Europe and a race to the bottom. Forget about your bus, on your Bike man.